Describe the similarities and differences between suprematism and constructivism. There is no prescribed word count; you just need to show that you understand the movements in broad terms.
- For each of these movements, find examples from their eras, and then two contemporary designs you think are influenced by these styles.
- Explain, in your own words, how you can see the influence of suprematism and constructivism in these modern-day designs.
The different is:
Supermatism was a style in the period 1915s – 1930s, founded by Kazmir Malevich . This style had key elements of :
- geometric shapes.
- the color-alert was very limited.
- use the shapes in bold and flat ways.
- a lot of negative space around the shapes.
- dynamic compositions.
- emphasize the relation between shapes an colors.


Kazimir Malevich in its period from 1915-1930s
Today you can see suprematism as pixel art , and Tom Chambers is an artist to watch.
Constructism is a style that comes from supermatism, that style got more life to the forms . And got used in real life with a purpose. Got used in war poster with a meaning and later in a wider range from book covers, logos, posters and advertisement.
- Layouts structured on a grid;
- Limited colour palettes;
- Tense diagonals;
- Sans-serif typography;
- Repetition of pure geometric forms;
- Experimentation with photomontage (he was a photographer of note as well);
- Methods of layering and superimposing of multiple images;
- Organised space in such a way that it gave words on a page new, energetic power.


So as you can see, constructivism is taken a bit further than suprematism but in use with same shapes, san-serif style and limited color palett.
KOK 24

Leave a comment